04.09.08

Some ideas to get Providence ahead of the curve

Posted in Advocacy by Margherita at 6:29 am

Take Alternate Route

By
GENE RUSSIANOFF
Published: April 9, 2008
WITH congestion pricing dead (for now), New York City is left with drivers still stuck in traffic and transit riders packed like sardines. How else can we ease traffic jams and provide decent and affordable bus and subway service? Both the state and the city have work to do.Gov. David Paterson took the first step yesterday by creating a panel to identify new ways to pay for mass transit. With the projected income from congestion pricing gone, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority faces a $17.5 billion deficit in its proposed $29.5 billion five-year capital program. That’s more hole than program.

In killing congestion pricing, Sheldon Silver, the Assembly speaker, acknowledged that the M.T.A. capital plan is “severely underfunded” and that the shortfall “has to be the first area of concern.” Now we need other sources of funding or increases in the corporate, real estate and gasoline taxes that finance the authority.

The state should now conduct a detailed environmental review of all options for reducing traffic. Many legislators who opposed congestion pricing expressed concern that Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s plan had been given only a truncated environmental review, when a full study under the State Environmental Quality Review Act was called for. There’s time now for a full study of all traffic-reducing options, from congestion pricing to restrictions on driving days based on license plate numbers to mandated car pooling. Such a review could give all the interested parties — including our next mayor — a better sense of what’s possible.

The Legislature should also give New York City the tools it needs to make buses go faster. Manhattan has the slowest buses in America; it takes more time to take the M15 from Harlem to City Hall than to travel by Amtrak from New York to Philadelphia. It doesn’t have to be this way. Other cities have demonstrated that buses go faster when more dedicated bus lanes are provided, when cameras mounted on buses are used to issue tickets to keep cars out of bus lanes and when traffic signals are designed to give buses priority.

Finally, the state should authorize the city to issue residential parking permits. A study in 2007 by the advocacy group Transportation Alternatives showed that 45 percent of traffic in Park Slope, Brooklyn, consists of cars cruising for parking spots. Residential parking permits would discourage commuters from using neighborhood streets as a parking lot.

Even without help from the state, New York City could fight traffic by making a stronger effort to cut down on special parking permits for public employees and others. An incredible 142,000 of these dashboard placards are now in circulation. Mayor Bloomberg has promised to reduce the number by 20 percent. If he’s successful, that could reduce daily driving to work by as many as 28,000 cars — more than a third of the number that congestion pricing was meant to eliminate.

And that doesn’t account for the unknown numbers of drivers who use fake placards. Janette Sadik-Khan, the city transportation commissioner, who is already trying to crack down on phony permits, should give traffic agents electronic devices that can distinguish forged permits from real ones and register when real permits are being used improperly.

The city should also increase the price of metered parking on Manhattan streets to encourage turnover of parking spots. The added revenue could pay for neighborhood traffic improvements that make streets safer for pedestrians and bicycle riders. The use of Muni-Meter parking permit machines, which charge higher hourly rates than coin meters do, should be expanded to crowded districts outside Manhattan.

New York has just had a high-volume debate on how to improve traffic and transit, and the message that came out of it is crystal clear: To get people moving faster and more comfortably in cars, buses and subways, the city and the state must work better together.

04.07.08

Potential for Bike-Friendly Law in CT

Posted in Advocacy by Mark Dieterich at 9:16 pm

An article posted on the Connecticut Press site discusses a proposed law, currently in front of the CT General Assembly.  If it goes through, then

motorists would have to give bicycles at least 3 feet of room and the state Department of Transportation would be forced to accommodate bikes and pedestrians on state highways under legislation pending in the General Assembly.

Rider advocates say it’s about time that the state acknowledged the needs of bicycles, particularly on state roads where, with the soaring price of gasoline and the arrival of spring, riding to work is a viable carbon-neutral option.

This follows closely on the heals of an ordinance we reported on being considered in Chicago to do much the same.  The article continues by saying that

The bill includes a new $200,000 “Share the Road” public-awareness campaign to make sure motorists give bikes a wider berth and that bikers make themselves safer. The legislation would be the first major bicycle initiative since 1997, when the General Assembly created the law requiring cyclists 15 years of age and younger to wear helmets.

So what about it Rhode Island are we going to be outdone by our neighbors to the West?

Cycling Injuries Research Study

Posted in Announcements by Mark Dieterich at 8:37 pm

There is a new study underway at Rhode Island Hospital to collect data about people who

ride their bikes for fitness, fun, competition, commuting or delivery of goods and services.

The study is one of only a few to focus specifically on cycling injuries. Our goal is to help improve and promote cycling for health and transportation.

Information will be collected via an online confidential survey. Participants will be anonymous.

This study is being done in conjunction with the Brown University School of Medicine and is being led by Mark Greve, MD.  Mark happens to be the new faculty sponsor of the Brown Cycling Club.  I’d encourage everyone to take a few minutes and fill out the online survey.

Advocacy Meeting

Posted in Events by Mark Dieterich at 8:08 am

May 1, 2008
6:00 pmto8:00 pm

Our monthly advocacy meeting will be at 6pm on May 1st, at the Hub.  Hope to see you there!

B2WD Meeting

Posted in Events by Mark Dieterich at 8:05 am

April 11, 2008
6:00 pmto8:00 pm

The next B2WD organizational meeting will be at 6pm on April 11th at Red Five Sports Group offices (269 South Main Street).  An agenda will be posted the to the email list prior to the meeting.

04.06.08

Sierra Club Bicycle Transportation Workshop

Posted in Events by Mark Dieterich at 8:13 pm

April 10, 2008
7:00 pmto8:00 pm

In advance of National Bike to Work Week, the RI Chapter of the Sierra Club, in conjunction with Providence Cycle, present a workshop on how to effectively use your bicycle for transportation. On Thursday, April 10th, 2008 @ 7pm cyclists can gather at Providence Bicycle (725 Branch Ave) on how to bike to and from work, school, or
errands. From outfitting yourself and your bicycle, to safe riding practices and route planning, the evening promises to deliver timely and useful information. Contact Maggie McCormick, dwyht@verizon.net, (401) 855-2103,
for more info.

04.05.08

Sierra Club workshop on how to use your bicycle as transportation

Posted in Advocacy, Bike Commuting, Bike-to-Work Day, Education by sparkjen at 12:54 pm

In advance of National Bike to Work Week (May 12-16), the Sierra Club presents a workshop on how to effectively use your bicycle as transportation to and from work, school, or errands. From outfitting yourself and your bicycle, to safe riding practices and route planning, the evening promises to deliver timely and useful information.

Date: Thursday, April 10, 2008
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Location: Providence Bicycle, 725 Branch Ave., PVD
Free and open to the public.

Contact Maggie McCormick, dwyht@verizon.net, (401) 855-2103 for more info.

04.04.08

Cargo Trikes in Cambridge, MA

Posted in Advocacy by Mark Dieterich at 10:46 am

A Christian Science Monitor article is reporting that

In a city choked with diesel-spewing delivery trucks, the fledgling New Amsterdam Project (NAP), a Cambridge-based cargo-hauling company, is pedaling toward profits aboard an emissions-free fleet of urban “cargo trikes.”

We’re getting trucks off the road, that’s one of our goals,” says Brown. “Each time we make a delivery, we demonstrate … that there’s a better way – a system that is less expensive, better for their products, better for the environment, and for their community.”

What say you Providence? In a city that can have gondolas provide people rides in the summer, should we be looking to support our own bicycle cargo company?