<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Providence Spent the Most on Pedestrian Projects?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects</link>
	<description>Providence Bicycle Coalition (PBC)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:19:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bike Providence &#187; It is dangerous out there after all</title>
		<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/comment-page-1#comment-25988</link>
		<dc:creator>Bike Providence &#187; It is dangerous out there after all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=1049#comment-25988</guid>
		<description>[...] week&#8217;s news that the Transportation for America&#8217;s report Dangerous by Design indicated that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week&#8217;s news that the Transportation for America&#8217;s report Dangerous by Design indicated that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Lewandowski</title>
		<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/comment-page-1#comment-25173</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Lewandowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=1049#comment-25173</guid>
		<description>This after they spent two years tearing down the lanes to the metal support beams on the Washington Bridge and repairing and resurfacing them in cement.

Where is the public outcry over this mismanagement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This after they spent two years tearing down the lanes to the metal support beams on the Washington Bridge and repairing and resurfacing them in cement.</p>
<p>Where is the public outcry over this mismanagement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dieterich</title>
		<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/comment-page-1#comment-25172</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dieterich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=1049#comment-25172</guid>
		<description>No significant money has been spent on the bike/ped path on the Washington Bridge yet.  The real work has yet to begin.  I&#039;ll have an update on this project in the next couple of weeks, once I learn the results of the  concrete evaluation.  This evaluation will determine whether work goes forward to revamp the existing structure or if an entirely new structure must be built.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No significant money has been spent on the bike/ped path on the Washington Bridge yet.  The real work has yet to begin.  I&#8217;ll have an update on this project in the next couple of weeks, once I learn the results of the  concrete evaluation.  This evaluation will determine whether work goes forward to revamp the existing structure or if an entirely new structure must be built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/comment-page-1#comment-25168</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=1049#comment-25168</guid>
		<description>Could the spending on the retrofitted pedestrian/bike path on the Washington Bridge skew the numbers significantly, depending on the definition of the costs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the spending on the retrofitted pedestrian/bike path on the Washington Bridge skew the numbers significantly, depending on the definition of the costs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Moritz</title>
		<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/comment-page-1#comment-25165</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Moritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=1049#comment-25165</guid>
		<description>Hrm, $4.01 per capita, population of about 1.5 million, over the course of 3 years, for a total of around $6 million on Pedestrians and Bicyclists.  That&#039;s a pathetic dollar figure and frightening to think that even less was spent elsewhere.

I can&#039;t find the FHA FMIS database to query to see what projects were paid for in the sample years.  I would guess that items such as the Blackstone Bike Path paving would be included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm, $4.01 per capita, population of about 1.5 million, over the course of 3 years, for a total of around $6 million on Pedestrians and Bicyclists.  That&#8217;s a pathetic dollar figure and frightening to think that even less was spent elsewhere.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find the FHA FMIS database to query to see what projects were paid for in the sample years.  I would guess that items such as the Blackstone Bike Path paving would be included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Lewandowski</title>
		<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/comment-page-1#comment-25070</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Lewandowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=1049#comment-25070</guid>
		<description>Most local municipalities in this state (RI) are not proactive about fostering any change when it comes to pedestrians or cyclists. Alternative transport to them means taking the bus.

Until you get the type of people that govern and manage the City of Portland into Rhode island - nothing is going to change.

Providence is 42 on the list (which includes Fall River and New Bedford for some unknown reason?) which makes it more dangerous than the City of Boston.

It also doesn&#039;t help that RI finished LAST in driver knowledge test conducted by GMAC Insurance a couple of years ago. Drivers not knowing the proper rules of the road will create more accidents.

Driver education my be the 1st place to start here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most local municipalities in this state (RI) are not proactive about fostering any change when it comes to pedestrians or cyclists. Alternative transport to them means taking the bus.</p>
<p>Until you get the type of people that govern and manage the City of Portland into Rhode island &#8211; nothing is going to change.</p>
<p>Providence is 42 on the list (which includes Fall River and New Bedford for some unknown reason?) which makes it more dangerous than the City of Boston.</p>
<p>It also doesn&#8217;t help that RI finished LAST in driver knowledge test conducted by GMAC Insurance a couple of years ago. Drivers not knowing the proper rules of the road will create more accidents.</p>
<p>Driver education my be the 1st place to start here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Davis</title>
		<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/comment-page-1#comment-25043</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=1049#comment-25043</guid>
		<description>Dennis, I&#039;d be happy to get answers for any of your questions via email if you want to hit me up directly. There&#039;s no polling data cited, just the Census data on percentage of commuters walking to work (Census doesn&#039;t really qualify as polling.) The fatality information (and definition of pedestrian) all comes from the FARS database. There&#039;s much more about our methodology on this page, but I&#039;ll be happy to fill in any gaps.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign/methodology&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign/methodology&lt;/a&gt;

Transportation for America, the Surface Transportation Policy Partnership, and a researcher from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign (NY/NJ/CT) did all the work on the report. It was funded in general by our campaign (T4A) with time from Tri-State as well.  It&#039;s a report that picks up where STPP&#039;s &quot;Mean Streets&quot; reports left off a few years ago (their last was in 2004, I believe.) It&#039;s intended to measure and analyze pedestrian fatalities, where they occur, why, and what we can do to end this tragic death of nearly 5,000 people per year. 

Anyway, feel free to get in touch with me if you have other questions we can answer. Would love to help out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, I&#8217;d be happy to get answers for any of your questions via email if you want to hit me up directly. There&#8217;s no polling data cited, just the Census data on percentage of commuters walking to work (Census doesn&#8217;t really qualify as polling.) The fatality information (and definition of pedestrian) all comes from the FARS database. There&#8217;s much more about our methodology on this page, but I&#8217;ll be happy to fill in any gaps.</p>
<p><a href="http://t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign/methodology" rel="nofollow">http://t4america.org/resources/dangerousbydesign/methodology</a></p>
<p>Transportation for America, the Surface Transportation Policy Partnership, and a researcher from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign (NY/NJ/CT) did all the work on the report. It was funded in general by our campaign (T4A) with time from Tri-State as well.  It&#8217;s a report that picks up where STPP&#8217;s &#8220;Mean Streets&#8221; reports left off a few years ago (their last was in 2004, I believe.) It&#8217;s intended to measure and analyze pedestrian fatalities, where they occur, why, and what we can do to end this tragic death of nearly 5,000 people per year. </p>
<p>Anyway, feel free to get in touch with me if you have other questions we can answer. Would love to help out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/comment-page-1#comment-24914</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=1049#comment-24914</guid>
		<description>A couple things stick out, to me.
1. Define Pedestrian
2. Providence seems to be a region (that includes a good chunk of Mass)
3. Providence also ranks #4 in pedestrian traffic fatalities... something strange there.

Some of the Transportation for America report seems to draw form polling, some from law enforcement data... and who knows what else. I think I&#039;d like to see who did the study, who funded it and what questions it was designed to answer. 

There are three types of lies. Plain lies, damn lies and statistics.
- Mark Twain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple things stick out, to me.<br />
1. Define Pedestrian<br />
2. Providence seems to be a region (that includes a good chunk of Mass)<br />
3. Providence also ranks #4 in pedestrian traffic fatalities&#8230; something strange there.</p>
<p>Some of the Transportation for America report seems to draw form polling, some from law enforcement data&#8230; and who knows what else. I think I&#8217;d like to see who did the study, who funded it and what questions it was designed to answer. </p>
<p>There are three types of lies. Plain lies, damn lies and statistics.<br />
- Mark Twain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Davis</title>
		<link>http://bikeprovidence.org/2009/11/10/providence-spent-the-most-on-pedestrian-projects/comment-page-1#comment-24912</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=1049#comment-24912</guid>
		<description>And feel free to get in touch with us if you have some questions like that you&#039;d like answered. We&#039;d be happy to help. FYI, the Providence metro area encompasses the entire state of RI, I believe. Census MSA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And feel free to get in touch with us if you have some questions like that you&#8217;d like answered. We&#8217;d be happy to help. FYI, the Providence metro area encompasses the entire state of RI, I believe. Census MSA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
